Left-Wingers and the Messiah Complex: Savior Mentality and Paternalistic Control
Will the real fascist please stand up?
Who doesn't know them: Western do-gooders proudly posing at African orphanages or development projects, smiling with a child in their arms as if they were saving the world. They adopt children, organize fundraisers, and flaunt their deeds on social media, while children closer to home, in poor European neighborhoods or marginalized communities, are overlooked. They sip their green tea while teaching asylum seekers the local language, while local children fall behind in reading and writing, and the elderly waste away in loneliness. The image they project is that of noble saviors, but a closer look reveals something else: a Messiah complex that disregards the autonomy, culture, and dignity of those they claim to "rescue."
The Messiah complex refers to the belief that one is called to save others, often without recognizing the capacities or autonomy of those being "helped." In the context of adoption and aid, this means Western workers often assume African children need saving, and that they — the Western "saviors" — are the solution. This leads to a paternalistic attitude that undermines the self-worth and capabilities of the very people involved.
Meanwhile, in Europe, for example in Moldova, thousands of children live in poverty and urgently need help. In 2022, 56,000 vulnerable Moldovan families received emergency aid, and thousands of children with disabilities or refugee backgrounds needed extra educational support. Yet, despite these pressing needs, Western aid efforts are often directed at Africa, while European children are neglected.
This raises the question: why do Western aid workers feel more drawn to African children than their European counterparts? Is it because African children appear "more exotic," or because it is easier for the Westerner to play the role of savior there? The Messiah complex seems central here: self-worth derived from saving others, instead of building truly equal partnerships with the communities they claim to help.
In social and political activism, a similar dynamic plays out. Left-wing progressives present themselves as defenders of marginalized groups, but their behavior reflects the Messiah complex: the belief that only they can save, protect, or educate, while the group they claim to help is viewed as inferior.
This manifests in three ways within the so-called "inferior group":
-
The less educated or less capable group: sometimes truly feels inferior, or is positioned that way by the savior; they remain dependent while their autonomy is denied.
-
The self-aware group: sharp enough to make their own choices, they exploit progressive naivety; appearing helpless allows them to benefit for years from social support while fully capable of independence.
-
The perceptive group: sees such "help" as condescending; they feel insulted or outraged at how their abilities are minimized. Their independence undermines the savior's narrative, so they are often dismissed as "right-wing."
The Paradox of "Anti-Racism" and Censorship
Beyond subtle paternalism, some progressives exhibit aggressive dominance: silencing anyone who questions their ideas. Ironically, this happens under banners like inclusivity or social justice, while the reality is discrimination and intolerance.
Examples include:
-
Slander and ridicule: critics are mocked or labeled morally inferior, regardless of their arguments.
-
Social and professional exclusion: dissenters risk careers, reputations, and social ties.
-
Violent escalation: as with Pim Fortuyn, where political opponents crossed from verbal to fatal assault.
One notorious case was Margriet Goris, an activist tied to the Eurodusnie collective, who in 2002 threw a pie filled with excrement into Pim Fortuyn's face. Though widely condemned, it symbolized how ideological superiority can escalate into physical intimidation.
The Role of Media and Platforms
The public opinion is significantly shaped by media and platforms like Wikipedia. Once praised for neutrality, it is now often criticized for political bias.
Larry Sanger, co-founder of Wikipedia, has repeatedly voiced concern that the site abandoned neutrality, becoming a tool of the "establishment left." In 2022 he said:
"Leftists are relentless when it comes to pushing their viewpoint and using the organs of mass media — and I think Wikipedia is now part of the mass media."
This bias is not just theoretical — it plays out in real cases. When Iryna Zarutska, a 23-year-old Ukrainian woman, was stabbed to death on a train in Charlotte, North Carolina, the facts were clear: she was murdered by a repeat offender, Decarlos Brown Jr., who was charged with first-degree murder. Yet when an article titled "Killing of Iryna Zarutska" was created on Wikipedia, editors immediately began pushing for its deletion. A banner at the top of the page warned that the article was "nominated for deletion," and behind the scenes editors argued that the incident did not deserve coverage.
This selective curation shows the very problem at the heart of Wikipedia's ideological capture: uncomfortable truths that do not fit a preferred narrative are downplayed, erased, or never allowed to gain traction. In this way, platforms that present themselves as neutral arbiters of information actively participate in shaping which tragedies matter and which are quietly forgotten.
This selective curation also reinforces the Messiah complex: presenting a controlled version of reality that validates the moral superiority of progressive movements while marginalizing dissent.
Violence and Fascist Escalation
On September 10, 2025, conservative activist Charlie Kirk was shot and killed while giving a lecture at Utah Valley University. The attack illustrates the danger of an ideology that sees itself as morally supreme and refuses to tolerate dissent. The violence against Kirk demonstrates how the Messiah complex, when radicalized and fused with ideological obsession, can escalate into real physical aggression. The conservative father-of-two, known for his thrilling debates with college kids across the country, was hit by a single bullet while speaking to a crowd at the public university in Orem on Wednesday afternoon. He collapsed immediately after being hit by the gunfire. Kirk leaves behind his wife Erika, with whom he had a three-year-old daughter and a son, 16 months. The couple celebrated their fourth wedding anniversary in May.
At the same time, movements like Black Lives Matter reveal systematic double standards. BLM is celebrated, while "White Lives Matter" is instantly dismissed as racist or extremist. This hypocrisy exposes the authoritarian streak within progressive circles: censorship, moral superiority, and the exclusion of any counter-narrative.
Conclusion
The Messiah complex among progressives results in paternalism, dependency, censorship, and at times outright violence. Their own moral framework trumps the autonomy and dignity of others. The combination of ideological obsession, media bias, selective hypocrisy, and aggression — from Pim Fortuyn to Charlie Kirk — reveals a distinctly fascist pattern: a belief in one's own superiority, intolerant of criticism and dissent.
The pattern is clear: modern Messiah-complex progressives preach equality and inclusion, yet systematically undermine autonomy and foster dependency. They reinforce their own sense of moral superiority and cement a culture of control and fear. The result is not only social and cultural decline, but also demographic: by painting the future as bleak, they sap confidence and discourage family growth.
Both in Europe and the U.S., what appears as altruism reveals itself as paternalistic — and at times dangerously fanatical. Today's so-called idealists are, paradoxically, the architects of a darker, emptier future.
Tyler Robinson (22), the alleged killer of Charlie Kirk, openly identified with far-left ideology. He had labeled Kirk a "fascist," was in a relationship with a transgender partner, and mocked the FBI manhunt on Discord just hours after the shooting. Reports indicate he kept bullet casings engraved with slogans like "Hey fascist! Catch!," "If you read this, you are gay, LMAO," and "Oh Bella Ciao…" — a nod to the Italian partisan anthem often associated with communist and far-left resistance movements.
It's revealing that Robinson called himself an "anti-fascist," while his methods mirrored the very tactics he claimed to oppose: censorship, intimidation, and violence. Charlie Kirk, by contrast, was known for engaging through speech, debate, and persuasion. Just as evil often masquerades as virtue, this self-styled "anti-fascist" exposed his true nature not through dialogue, but through bullets.
Meet they/them.. In Mark 5:1–20, Luke 8:26–39, and Matthew 8:28–34, Jesus meets a man possessed by a legion of demons. When Jesus asks the demon's name, it replies: "My name is Legion, for we are many."
The hypocrisy is off the charts
📌 Assassinating people for their opinions = Fascism
📌 Hiring with preferential treatment = Racism
The left hates Charlie Kirk, claiming he is transphobic and homophobic—which is false and contradicted by his own videos. He holds different values but has stated he does not hate anyone. Meanwhile, the left supports Palestinians who are openly transphobic and homophobic.
So why does the radical left wave pro-Palestine flags while ignoring the brutal reality of Islamist regimes? Churches are attacked, Christians murdered, women raped, homosexuals persecuted—yet no protests from the left. Why?
Because their alliance is ideological, not moral. The radical left sees Islamism as a tool against Western values, even if it means turning a blind eye to misogyny, homophobia, and religious violence. It's not solidarity—it's hypocrisy.
They also suffer from historical amnesia. In their tunnel vision, only the white man is guilty of slavery—ignoring the fact that nearly every civilization practiced slavery, and that it still exists today in places like Saudi Arabia. But that doesn't fit their narrative. Their racial lens is driven not by justice, but by resentment and hate. If the left (Antifa. BLM etc) truly stood for human rights, they would protest child marriages, honor-based violence, and anti-LGBTQ teachings — regardless of religion. But they don't. Their silence speaks volumes.
While Nigerian Christians are being slaughtered by Islamic extremists, liberals line up to chant 'Free Palestine' – the same BLM movement, just in a new guise.
This isn't about 'freedom.' It's about hating Western civilization and paving the way for an Islamic takeover. Just ask Europe how flooding their countries with Muslims has worked out.
Christian lives don't rank high on the Left's victim hierarchy. You can be burned alive and they won't care because you have the wrong religion. The left doesn't defend the oppressed. It defends whoever hates the west the most.
So far, more than 2 million tons of aid have been sent to Gaza, along with over 130 million meals from GHF. According to recent reports, each person there receives more than 3,000 calories per day. We are talking about a population that cheered, laughed, and even spat on Shani Louk, the pacifist girl who became a victim of the attack during the NOVA Festival.
Meanwhile, more than 200,000 people have died of hunger in Yemen. Almost no aid reaches them, and the international activism hardly talks about them. It seems that the support for Gaza is more about showing how 'morally good' people are, rather than genuinely addressing hunger. As a result, other Arab populations, such as the Yemenis, are left out in the cold
Left-wingers celebrate the death of a human being
The left hated Charlie Kirk because they claim he was transphobic and homophobic.
The left loves Palestinians who are openly transphobic and homophobic.
Many Members of the European Parliament from the right-wing EPP, ECR and Patriots groups wanted the European Parliament to hold a minute of silence for Charlie Kirk at today's plenary session
In left-wing mindsets, there's no room for debate—only for violence, intolerance and hatred. They cannot coexist with those who hold different views.
When political discourse turns into celebration of death, something has gone terribly wrong. The fact that some rejoice over the passing of a man who stood for dialogue and understanding reveals a troubling shift in our moral compass. In any ideology—left, right, or otherwise—there should be room for debate, not dehumanization.
While the EU refused to honor Charlie Kirk with even a minute of respect—a victim of a political murder—they gave tribute to George Floyd, a criminal killed by officers who were Black, White, and Asian, exposing the blatant double standards of media, politics, and activism.
That cheering over the death of innocents… now where have we seen that before?
Afghan muslima Fatima Payman, Senator for Western Australia since 2022, mocked Charlie Kirk's assassination in a TikTok video—calling him a "terrible person" and sneering at those who mourned him. She said: "RIP—whatever you want it to mean. Some say: no peace. Fill in the blanks." In 2024, Payman left the Labor Party and launched her own political movement, Australia's Voice, built on progressive identity politics.
Somali muslima Ilhan Omar mocked Charlie Kirk after his assassination—calling Republicans "full of s" for mourning him. She married her own brother to obtain U.S. citizenship, according to long-circulating allegations.
She built her career on leftist identity politics, while accusing white men of being the greatest domestic threat.
By their fruits you'll know them.
BTW Ilhan Omar's now-infamous quote, "Some people did something," wasn't just disrespectful. It was disgraceful. While America mourned the loss of 3,000 lives on 9/11, she minimized the attack. Someone who speaks like this about terrorism has no business shaping laws.
The Influence of Left-Wing Extremism on Universities
A good teacher doesn't teach you what to think, but how to think!
On X (formerly Twitter) Harry Pettit (lecturer in social geography at Radboud University (Netherlands)) wrote (2025, source msn.com):
"Het is tijd om af te maken waar de Palestijnen op 7 oktober mee begonnen zijn." "Ik stop niet tot Israël verdwenen is."
The name of the teacher was not made public in the reports but after the murder of Charlie Kirk, a teacher working at the Bornego College in Heerenveen (Netherlands) who teaches philosophy, ethics and life sciences, wrote the following on social media (X and BlueSky) (see source, 2025)
"Happy Charlie Kirk Day to everyone who celebrates it," with a heart.
"Dead Nazis are always good," referring to Charlie Kirk.
When asked whether you should or should shoot fascists, he wrote: "Interesting ethical question. I'll think about a lesson plan."
Note that so far, no racist statements by Charlie Kirk have been found. When quotes are read in context—not snippets but full text—one doesn't find the Nazi portraying the far-left. However, also note that everything Charlie stood for, such as Christianity and the traditional family, was repugnant to them.
Naturally, Harry Pettit (Radboud University) expresses his support for the suspended teacher and calls it "disgusting" that a colleague is under fire for supposedly celebrating the death of "a racist hate preacher." Here too, the smear campaign continues without investigating Kirk, or deliberately dismissing what hate preaching actually entails because his ideology doesn't fit his agenda. That's what we call fascism, by the way! As a result of teachers like this, you get these kinds of reactions from students (source). Even at the University of Amsterdam, some students aren't sad about Kirk's murder. "I think he deserved it," says one student. "I really mean it." Another student says: "I'm glad he's not here anymore. We have to use violence, because the far-right uses violence against us."
Pettit responds that he wishes "this was one of his students."
Schools Marxist breeding grounds of political intimidation
At the Wageningen University & Research (WUR) in Wageningen, another extremist teaches a class: Margriet Goris, who threw a cake covered in feces in Pim Fortuyn's face in 2002. Both Jelle Goezinnen and Margriet Goris were arrested in May 2002 in connection with the cake protest against Pim Fortuyn. They were members of the Biologische Bakkers Brigade (Organic Bakers Brigade), an activist group linked to the Leiden anarchist collective Eurodusnie. (source)
A few weeks after this dehumanizing action and a campaign of demonization, Pim Fortuyn was shot dead by a far-left activist. You attack opponents with words and discussions, not with violence, with filthy cakes and bullets. That's fascism.
Researcher Peter Siebelt delves deeper into the matter in the latest issue of his newsletter "Wetenswaardigheden" (Weeping Things). Siebelt, an international expert on activist groups and terrorism, has been working for months to map the network surrounding Volkert van der G. Van der G.'s former hometown of Wageningen plays a key role in this. Using a stack of documentary material, Siebelt demonstrates how various activist groups in the university city were interconnected: pie-throwers and Volkert van der G. belonged to the same circles.
"The link between Van der G. and the cake brigades is Judith Scheltema," says Siebelt. "Van der G., his girlfriend Petra L., and Scheltema were good friends. Together, the three were active for years in Wageningen against, among other things, genetically modified food - Scheltema in the action group NoGen, Petra L. in the Stichting Lekker Dier (Foundation for Delicious Animals), and Van der G. in the action group de Ziedende Bintjes (Seething Bins).
According to Siebelt, Scheltema lived with Van der G. for several years in the alternative Wageningen housing complex Droevendaal. Currently, she and her organization, Refugees Under Roof, are camped out in the activist stronghold De Wilde Wereld, which maintains close ties with the Leiden cake-making stronghold Eurodusnie. Visits from strangers are not appreciated in De Wilde Wereld. The police are even less welcome there.
Black racist Lucas
Black YouTuber Lucas Beyn has released a video in which he states that he has spoken to 99.99% of Black people and claims they are "deeply uncaring" about what happened to Iryna on the train. (source)
It is deeply troubling to see how much hate and indifference exists in some people. At the same time, this page fortunately shows that not everyone is racist, and that there are people who do show compassion and stand up for justice, like the Hodgetwins.
It serves as a reminder that, despite the darkness, there are always glimpses of humanity and empathy.
The Tyranny of the Vocal Few
So Lucas Beyn claims in a video that he has spoken to 99.99% of Black people and that they show "no compassion" for what happened to Iryna on the train. A false narrative, typical of the left: misrepresenting the majority to stir people up.
"And let's be clear: had this been reversed—had a White man stabbed a minority refugee-the media would be running wall-to-wall coverage. Instead, there are no hashtags, no vigils on cable news, no politicians pounding podiums. Just silence.> Quote from Ken Blackwell @kenblackwell19 About the celebration on Charlie's murder: "This is hatred so dark that it cheers for bloodshed".
Iryna's mural was vandalized. She had a BLM poster in her bedroom. She was the victim of a horrific crime. Yet despite this, she remains vilified by the left.
The Messiah complex of fools
Left-Wing Reports Always Dubious
The Cato Institute just published a report claiming right-wing violence is far more common than left-wing violence, and they released it in the very month that Charlie Kirk was assassinated. That timing is revolting, but the data itself is even worse!The Daily Caller exposed how Alex Nowrasteh's list conveniently left out key left-wing killers that would have changed the balance.
The Waukesha killer in 2021 drove his SUV through a Christmas parade, killing six and injuring dozens more, after a stream of anti-white social media posts, rapping against Donald Trump, and voicing support for Black Lives Matter.
A local BLM chapter even raised money for his bail. Jessica Doty-Whitaker was shot and killed by BLM protesters after she or someone in her group said "all lives matter."
Her case remains unsolved, yet CATO never counted it.An anti-natalist bombed an IVF clinic in 2025, killing one person, and that too was ignored.Those omissions are not small. Adding them would nudge the left-wing category above the right wing category, destroying the entire premise of CATO's report.And of course, the other issue with Nowrasteh's list is that it only counts killings. That means it leaves out some of the most notorious acts of political violence of our time.It ignores the two assassination attempts on Donald Trump.
It ignores the 2017 Republican baseball shooting that nearly killed Steve Scalise.It ignores the attempted stabbing of Lee Zeldin on the campaign trail.It ignores a neighbor's brutal attack on Sen. Rand Paul that broke his ribs.
It ignores the man arrested outside Justice Brett Kavanaugh's home with plans to assassinate him.It ignores the bomb planted under a Fox News van that failed to detonate.Every one of these is political violence, and every one is erased by CATO's framework.
This is not honest research. It is manipulation to smear the right and excuse the left.Because the truth is that violence is not accidental on the left, it is built into their philosophy.
They believe government is the weapon, mobs are their muscle, and coercion is their road to power.When the left is angry, cities burn. When the left is challenged, opponents are silenced with threats.
When the left loses, violence is the answer.The right responds to tragedy in an entirely different way. We turn to God, to community, to vigils and prayer. We believe in healing, not burning.That is the divide CATO refuses to acknowledge.
The left turns to fire. But the right turns to faith. And until America faces that truth, no amount of fake statistics will hide where the real epidemic of violence comes from.
Source: Ken Blackwell
Who was George Floyd?
George Floyd was a 46-year-old Black man who died on May 25, 2020, during an arrest by the Minneapolis police. Even before he was restrained on the ground, he repeatedly stated that he couldn't breathe, using phrases like "I can't breathe," while resisting arrest. Eventually, he lay handcuffed on the ground as former officer Derek Chauvin, a white man, pressed his knee on Floyd's neck for approximately nine minutes. Three other officers were present: Tou Thao (Hmong/Asian), J. Alexander Kueng (Black), and Thomas Lane (white).
Floyd had prior convictions, but the arrest on May 25 was related to a suspected counterfeit $20 bill, not his criminal history.
The official autopsy concluded that Floyd's death was a homicide caused by cardiac and pulmonary arrest while being restrained by police. Underlying health conditions and drug use were contributing factors, but not the primary cause. An independent autopsy, commissioned by Floyd's family, concluded that he died from asphyxiation due to pressure on his neck and back, which restricted blood flow to his brain.
Although the trial against Derek Chauvin focused on his actions rather than his ethnicity, the Black Lives Matter movement immediately racialized the incident. The presence of officers from diverse ethnic backgrounds—including an Asian and a Black colleague—was ignored in favor of a simplistic black-and-white narrative. In the name of justice, entire neighborhoods were destroyed, including businesses owned by Black entrepreneurs who had no connection to the incident. The movement claimed to stand for Black lives, yet remained silent when Black officers were victims of violence at the hands of Black perpetrators. Selective outrage became the norm: not the life itself, but its political utility determined the attention.
Terrence K Williams - As a Black man, it hurts my soul to see people call Charlie Kirk a racist. I knew him personally and I can tell you, he was nothing but kind to me. Charlie never looked at me as a color, he looked at me as a friend, as a brother.
He went out of his way to help me, to open doors for me, to make sure I had opportunities I didn't even ask for. That's who he was, just generous, thoughtful, and loyal.To hear people smear his name with lies is painful, because I knew the real Charlie. He wasn't about division, he was about lifting people up, no matter where they came from or what they looked like.And honestly, this all still feels unreal. I still cry, It's hard to accept that he's gone. A man who gave so much, who inspired so many, taken from us too soon.Charlie Kirk was more than a leader — he was a friend, a brother, and a true American patriot.
The new fascists will call themselves anti-fascists ...
Double Standards and Symbols: The Flag Logic of Antifa Netherlands
2025 (source) The recent statement by Antifa Netherlands about stadium atmosphere and political expressions in football culture reveals a recurring pattern of ideological inconsistency. On the one hand, they praise clubs like FC St. Pauli, where rainbow flags, "Refugees Welcome" banners, and Antifa symbolism are on proud display. On the other hand, they call for banning the Dutch national flag from stadiums, claiming it is being misused to promote nationalism and right-wing extremism.
That may sound principled, until you ask the obvious question: why is nationalist symbolism a problem, but leftist ideological symbols are not? If a national flag is inherently dangerous or exclusionary, how is it acceptable to glorify figures like Karl Marx or Che Guevara—individuals whose ideas and regimes are historically linked to millions of deaths?
Here lies the core issue: Antifa claims to oppose nationalism, but selectively embraces symbols that serve its own political agenda. Contradictions - as always - are conveniently ignored.
The rejection of the Dutch flag is not a principled stance against flag worship in general, but rather an attempt to reshape public space into an ideological echo chamber—where only "approved" symbols are allowed, and others are simply cancelled.
Freedom of expression—including through flags and visual displays—applies to everyone in a democratic society. Whether it's a rainbow, an Antifa flag, or the red-white-and-blue of the Netherlands, the standard should be the same.
Antifa should either accept that, or at least admit they're not against flag-waving—just against flags that aren't theirs.
ANTIFA violence – Budapest, February 2023
Hammer Attacks
In February 2023, Budapest was shaken by a series of violent attacks carried out by far-left activists linked to Antifa networks from Germany and Italy. The perpetrators targeted random passersby whom they identified as right-wing extremists based on their clothing style — such as bomber jackets or camouflage trousers.
Suspects
-
Ilaria Salis (Italy): Accused of participating in the attacks. She was imprisoned in Hungary for over a year and was later elected as a Member of the European Parliament representing the Italian party Alleanza Verdi e Sinistra. Her election granted her parliamentary immunity, which led to diplomatic tensions between Italy, Hungary, and the European Parliament.
-
Johannes Domhöver (Germany): Member of the so-called "Hammer Gang," a group of far-left activists. He was arrested and linked to multiple attacks.
-
Jasper W. (Germany): Also arrested and suspected of involvement in the violence.
The Attacks
The attacks took place around February 10, 2023, during the annual commemoration event of the "Day of Honour," a controversial gathering of right-wing groups.
Victims were surrounded and beaten with hammers, sticks, and other weapons. At least four people were seriously injured.
The perpetrators wore masks and operated in organized groups, indicating premeditated actions.
⚖️ Legal and Political Aftermath
Hungarian authorities labeled the attacks as "far-left terrorism."
The case gained international attention when Ilaria Salis was elected to the European Parliament. Her detention conditions — including being shackled during court appearances — were criticized by human rights organizations.
In June 2024, the European Parliament refused to lift her immunity, despite Hungary's request.
Fact-checkers say that the quote 'Colored people are like human weeds and need to be exterminated' is not authentic. Yet it raises questions, given that Sanger also gave a lecture to a KKK meeting in 1926.
Source 2025 - Daily Mail can reveal that the man behind the vile chant is a veteran pro-Palestine, student activist.
The chant: 'Gaza, Gaza make us proud, put the Zios in the ground.' 'Zio' - a term formed by Grand Wizard of the KKK David Duke - is a slur made by shortening the word 'Zionist' and is often directed towards Jewish people.
Pictures from Samuel Williams' Instagram account show him regularly sporting a red and white Keffiyeh scarf which has become associated with the pro Palestine movement.
Before winning a coveted place at Oxford, Mr Williams attended the Bennett Memorial Disocesan school in Tunbridge Wells.
And since joining the university he has dedicated his life, not to his studies, but to student activism and Palestine.
Several pictures taken from his Instagram account show Mr Williams' participating in the highly controversial Oxford University student encampments.
Mr Williams was amongst dozens of students who occupied and camped outside the Oxford Natural History museum to protest against their university's alleged complicity in Israel's war against Hamas.
In another disturbing image, Mr Williams can be seen wearing a khaki military jacket and smirking while he waves a presumably fake gun in the air.