Fifth Columnists
Jewish and Islamic communities share a remarkable amount of cultural and historical heritage. Both traditions observe rituals such as circumcision and specific forms of ritual slaughter, and both are rooted in a broader Semitic history. This shared origin emphasizes that the two groups, despite their current political conflicts, are related in many respects. It is precisely this connection that could form a basis for peaceful dialogue and mutual understanding, without the rest of the world being drawn into the conflict.
A possible path toward de-escalation lies in reconsidering practices and beliefs that were historically shaped in times of conflict. Embracing ideas focused on compassion, mutual respect, and minimizing harm—such as certain ethical approaches within veganism or other peace-oriented rituals-can create space for new forms of cooperation. When both communities see themselves as heirs to a shared history, a foundation emerges where humanity and compassion can take center stage.
Halal slaughterhouses
Another fact: in both the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, mistreatment of donkeys is a documented problem. Organizations such as Safe Haven for Donkeys and Starting Over Sanctuary regularly report cases of donkeys being beaten, overworked with excessively heavy loads, or left with injuries caused by tight chains and ropes. Due to the ongoing war in Gaza, the situation has deteriorated; many animals there are now also suffering from hunger, dehydration, and untreated injuries resulting from violence. Although many owners depend on their donkeys for transport and attempt to care for them, in some areas there is a lack of education and resources for the proper treatment of these working animals.
Kosher slaughterhouses
It is also a fact that in Israel, during the festival of Lag Ba'Omer, incidents have been documented in which animal abuse occurred, such as throwing kittens or puppies into bonfires. These acts are recognized by the Israeli government and animal rights organizations such as Let the Animals Live as serious vandalism. Because of these incidents, the Israeli Police deploy additional patrols and volunteers each year to monitor the bonfires and protect animals.
Dancing Israelis on 9/11
Celebrating Palestinians on 9/11
In today's public debate, it is striking how quickly criticism is neutralized by labels. Those who discuss Israel's policies are sometimes immediately branded as antisemitic. Those who point out injustices within Islamic contexts are quickly labeled Islamophobic. In both cases, the same thing happens: the conversation is terminated before it can substantively begin.
As Dr. Norman Finkelstein — himself Jewish and the son of Holocaust survivors - emphasizes, Zionism is a political ideology and not synonymous with Judaism as a religion or identity. Structurally conflating these two concepts not only hinders debate but also the freedom to critically examine political ideas. A similar confusion arises when criticism of Islamic extremism is automatically interpreted as hostility toward Muslims as a whole. Criticism of ideas, structures, or policies is not the same as criticism of people.
A mature society must be capable of identifying injustices and asking difficult questions without moral labels prematurely blocking the conversation. Only then is there room for nuance, mutual understanding, and genuine progress.
Israel and its Zionism
Palestine with its Hamas
Mossad Shadow Operations: What Happens Behind the Scenes
4 January 2026 (source) "The former Mossad chief of Israel lifts the veil on the country's astonishing assassinations. Just over a week ago, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian declared that his country is now at war with the U.S., Europe, and Israel. … There is no better organization for that task than the Israeli Mossad, and no better person to speak about it than its former leader, Yossi Cohen. Cohen led the agency from 2016 to 2021. He greets me from a modest office in downtown Tel Aviv. This is a man who, as a Mossad operative, repeatedly went undercover in the Arab world, each time risking torture and death. For Cohen, the Mossad operates according to a single principle – a principle he returns to repeatedly in our interview and in his book Sword of Freedom: Israel, Mossad and the Secret War, which lies between us on the polished table. 'We can't be number two anywhere,' he tells me. 'Be first and be decisive – that is the rule.'"
Mossad is Israel's foreign intelligence agency. In the excerpt above, Mossad is portrayed as exceptionally effective and almost heroic. It is therefore not a neutral analysis, but an admiring, almost promotional piece.
But strikingly, the Mossad was unable to prevent anything on October 7. Such a tragedy then provided exactly the momentum that the Israeli government used to justify the large-scale attack on Gaza, strongly appealing to public emotions and using the fate of the hostages as a political tool.
"We can't be number two anywhere," Cohen said. This is an extremely absolute statement. It suggests that Israeli intelligence agencies must always be the best, regardless of context or reality. It sounds more like a slogan than a sober analysis. And the way assassinations are described as "audacious" and almost heroic, with words like "ruthless," "bold," "professional hit," "masters of hybrid warfare"—that is a tone that conveys admiration rather than objective reporting. The result is less a journalistic account and more a glossy promotional piece for the Mossad.
Charlie Kirk had become particularly critical in his final days
Before he began criticizing, Kirk repeatedly stated that he supported Israel, and Netanyahu has also publicly acknowledged this.
Critical questions that may be asked
If history is written by the winners and the news by those in power, where does factual truth remain?
Why does Egypt keep the border with Gaza largely closed, and which political, security, and international factors play a role in this?
Which role did Larry Silverstein play before and after 9/11, and how coincidental is it that his children, Roger and Lisa, were also not in the WTC that morning because they arrived late? Statistically, what are the chances that both he and his children were precisely outside the affected part of the building at that moment? More questions
How is it that exactly 6 million Jews were killed, a figure that had allegedly been stated as early as 1918?
Speaking of prophetic matters: after all these years of seeing everything dismissed as coincidence and conspiracy theories, isn't it highly coincidental that events are repeatedly linked to Freemasonry? Michael Jackson's album cover is one such example.
If there were a famine in Gaza, why is that not visible in the publicly released footage of these executions? How can we explain this?
Why we should always critically evaluate information
Sometimes claims sound like pure fiction, while reality is more nuanced (or shocking) than we think. Here are some historical examples that show why a healthy dose of skepticism is important:
Contaminated Polio Vaccines
Between 1955 and 1963, batches of the polio vaccine were found to be contaminated with cells linked to cancer, which caused a massive shock in the medical world at the time.
Manipulated Sugar Research
For years, the sugar industry (including Coca-Cola) funded studies that downplayed the health risks of sugar and unfairly shifted the blame toward fats.
Bohemian Grove
It sounds like a movie script, but the world's most powerful leaders do indeed gather annually in a private setting at a heavily secured campground in California. This club is known for theatrical rituals in nature, such as the "Cremation of Care" performed in front of a large owl statue.
Bilderberg Conference
An annual private meeting of approximately 130 political leaders and experts from industry, finance, and media across Europe and North America.
Operation Mockingbird
In the last century, the CIA infiltrated American media by paying journalists to spread propaganda and influencing student organizations. See the statements from Qatar in the video below, and find more about this on Wikipedia here.
Operation Paperclip
Immediately following World War II, the American government secretly brought 1,600 Nazi scientists to the U.S. to work on military projects.
Here is the English translation of the text provided:
Sounds like fiction, but this, too, is a true story:
Analysis of shocking testimonies: From Monterrey to the Epstein files
In 2009, 21-year-old model Gabriela Rico Jiménez drew international attention after she was filmed in a state of distress in Monterrey, Mexico. During her arrest, which followed a private gathering for the elite, she shouted disturbing accusations about murder and claimed that "they ate human flesh." Although authorities at the time attributed her behavior to a mental breakdown, Jiménez disappeared entirely from the public eye after the incident, fueling speculation to this day.
The shocking nature of her statements bears striking similarities to testimonies that surfaced years later in the notorious Epstein files. In documents released by the U.S. Department of Justice, including an official FBI FD-302 report, a male witness likewise makes horrific allegations regarding the American elite. According to this witness, he was not only raped by George H.W. Bush but was also subjected to a violent ritual in which his feet were mutilated with a sword.
The statements in the file, however, go even further.
The witness describes scenes on a yacht where a child was allegedly brutally mutilated and killed, after which those present reportedly engaged in cannibalism and the consumption of human excrement.
While these testimonies appear verbatim in official FBI documents, they remain unconfirmed allegations. An FD-302 report is a record of what a witness stated, not a determination of what actually occurred. To date, no forensic evidence or legal substantiation has been found to support these extreme accusations. The similarity between Jiménez's public outburst and the accounts in the Epstein files raises complex questions about how such claims are weighed by investigative agencies: are they rightly dismissed as psychotic delusions, or do they vanish into the shadows of bureaucracy due to a lack of evidence?
They need Christ...
Islamic terrorist meets Jesus
Orthodox Jew meets Jesus
Are We Importing Foreign Conflicts into Our Own Debate?
It remains difficult to understand why the suffering of civilians like Shani Louk-a young woman who refused military service and was known for her pacifist beliefs-receives little attention in some activist circles. Compassion should not depend on political position.
Distinguishing Judaism from Zionism: A Former Zionist's Perspective
See the email and speech here: Full Speech Of Rabbi Rabbinovitch Found
"Forbid white men to mate with white men. White women must coexist with members of the dark races, white men with black women. Thus the white race will disappear, for the mixing of the dark with the white will mean the end of the white man, and our most dangerous enemy will become but a memory. We will enter a ten-thousand-year era of peace and plenty, the Pax Judaica, and our race will rule the world unchallenged. Our superior intelligence will easily enable us to maintain power over a world of dark peoples." – Rabbi Rabbinovich
Rose Rabbinovich presents herself as a former Zionist Jewish woman living in Melbourne, Australia.
She claims that Zionism secretly controls Jews and non-Jews, asserts that mainstream Jewish communities are deliberately kept in the dark, and portrays Zionism as a corrupt, or even satanic, force within Judaism.
The piece is presented as a warning to the world and encourages the dissemination of The Protocols, claiming that global conflict will ensue if the "Zionist agenda" is not exposed.
Zionist Sarah Hurwitz on social media, youth, and perceptions of Israel
Sarah Hurwitz, a former speechwriter for Barack and Michelle Obama, considers herself a liberal Zionist. She recently spoke (in 2025) at an event hosted by the Jewish Federations of North America about the influence of social media and unfiltered images of the Gaza conflict on how young people view Israel and the Middle East. Hurwitz pointed out that TikTok and similar platforms constantly expose young people to images of violence and suffering in Gaza. She argues that this constant exposure makes it difficult to have a nuanced conversation about Israel, as young people are already emotionally affected by what they see. She also explained that Holocaust education can sometimes lead to simplified comparisons between historical events and the current situation, as young people interpret the roles of powerful Israelis and vulnerable Palestinians through that historical "Nazi-Jewish" framework. Sarah Hurwitz pointed out that adults, including politicians, academics, teachers, and the media, have a role in providing context and guidance for how young people understand the conflict in Gaza and Israel.Israeli Sephardic leader Rabbi Ovadia Yosef said in his weekly sermon Saturday night that non-Jews exist to serve Jews
"Judaism first taught the world that all individuals are created in the divine image, which formed the foundation of our moral code. A rabbi should be the first, not the last, to exemplify that fundamental teaching of our tradition."
Tsunami of similar statements
"The white race is the cancer of human history." – Susan Sontag
"You white people are on an endangered list. And unlike, say, the bald eagle or some exotic species of muskrat, you are not worth saving. In forty years or so, maybe fewer, there won't be any more white people around, and that's a good thing." - Tim Wise
"The goal of abolishing the white race is, on its face, so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists... Keep bashing the dead white males, the living ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as 'the white race' is destroyed." - Noel Ignatiev
It is understandable why some people then overreact to the above statements and develop tunnel vision: "An abnormal reaction to an abnormal situation is normal behavior." - Viktor E. Frankl, said the Austrian neurologist, psychiatrist, and Holocaust survivor.
The Muslim Brotherhood under scrutiny: Arab criticism and experiences
The Muslim Brotherhood is one of the most controversial political and religious movements in modern Arab history. Originally founded in Egypt in 1928 by Hassan al-Banna, the movement grew from a religious reform group into an organization with political ambitions, social structures, and international ramifications. This transformation has led to fierce criticism from various Arab commentators, insiders, and even former members, who strongly condemn the Brotherhood's ideology and operations within their own societies.
One of the best-known Arab critics is Tharwat el-Kherbawy, an Egyptian lawyer and former leader of the Muslim Brotherhood. He has repeatedly spoken and written about what he sees as the movement's deception: in his view, the Brotherhood uses Islamist rhetoric to pursue political power, while conflating political interests with religious legitimacy. El-Kherbawy left the organization for precisely this reason and warns that the movement does not have a purely religious mission, but is primarily politically focused on power within the state and society.
Criticism is also emerging within broader Arab opinion. In Egypt itself, after the short presidential term of Mohammed Morsi, who emerged from the Brotherhood, a wide range of citizens and activists openly expressed their disappointment with the organization. Morsi's government, which initially gave many voters hope, quickly lost support as the economy deteriorated and Morsi attempted to consolidate power through decrees that overrode the law. Hisham and Tommy, two secular Egyptian activists who participated in the Tahrir Square protests, ultimately viewed the Muslim Brotherhood as a political force that failed to live up to their expectations and even contributed to new forms of discontent.
Established publicists in the Arab world are also highlighting the problem. Some media outlets and social commentators are criticizing how the Brotherhood is presented by media outlets and political networks and the influence it attempts to exert. In Egypt and beyond, attention was drawn to how reporting on protesters and Brotherhood sympathizers was manipulated to suggest broader support for the movement, while many critics, on the other hand, felt the organization was too unwilling to make genuine democratic reforms.
Beyond Egypt's borders, there are additional Arab perceptions that warn of the Muslim Brotherhood's influence on regional politics and internal stability. In the Gulf region, for example, Qatar's support for the Muslim Brotherhood has caused tensions with other states such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Bahrain, which saw the movement as a threat to their own stability and political order.
Critics from these countries speak not only about ideas but about the concrete geopolitical consequences of Brotherhood support and the export of their ideological influence.
In addition, governments in several Arab countries have taken harsh measures against the Muslim Brotherhood because they directly associate this movement with a threat to national security.
For example, Jordan has banned the local branch of the Brotherhood and arrested members on allegations that they threatened state security with paramilitary activities — allegations that resonate across the region and stem from actual political conflicts between governments and Brotherhood structures.
Criticism within the Arab world focuses not only on the Muslim Brotherhood's political practices but also on what critics consider the ambiguity of the ideology itself: public moderation versus the pursuit of religious goals behind the scenes, which leads to divisions within societies. In Egypt and elsewhere, many believe the movement blurs the lines between religion and nationalism to maximize its influence, rather than genuinely supporting an open, democratic, and inclusive political system.
In this sense, the Arab voices criticizing the Muslim Brotherhood are not marginal or merely outsiders: they are former insiders, social commentators, secular and religious Arabs, and even citizens who witnessed the movement's consequences in their own lives and countries during revolutions and protests. Their criticism focuses not only on abstract theories but on concrete experiences of political failure, social unrest, and the perception that religious symbolism is being used as a tool for political power.
While in the West criticism of Islamist influence is dismissed as Islamophobia, countries like the UAE are openly drawing a line:
UAE cuts funding for UK studies amid concerns about extremism on campuses
January 2026 (source) - The United Arab Emirates has removed British universities from its list of foreign institutions eligible for government-funded scholarships. This eliminates government funding for Emirati students wishing to study in the UK.
UAE officials have linked the decision to concerns about Islamist influence on British campuses, particularly from groups affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, which the UAE designates as a terrorist organization. The UK does not ban the Muslim Brotherhood, a long-standing point of contention between the two countries. The policy does not prevent UAE students from studying in the UK with private funding, but degrees from British institutions may no longer be officially recognized for UAE government employment or accreditation purposes.
Why the history of exclusion still haunts us....
en het uitmoorden van duizenden Ghazanen zonder consequenties blijft
en kritiek op Israel blijft bestaan..
It is a historical fact that Jewish communities have been expelled from countless European cities and countries throughout the centuries. These waves of exclusion occurred in almost every part of the continent. In the Middle Ages, this led to dramatic events such as the expulsion from England at the end of the thirteenth century and the large-scale expulsions from France shortly thereafter.
One of the most dramatic moments in this history occurred at the end of the fifteenth century in the Iberian Peninsula. Here, Jews were forced to convert or leave their homelands of Spain and Portugal, leading to a massive dispersal of the Jewish population throughout the world. Similar expulsions regularly occurred in Central European cities like Vienna and Prague, often at the behest of rulers seeking forgiveness of debts to Jewish lenders or scapegoats for epidemics and social unrest.
Although the Enlightenment period brought greater tolerance, the most violent form of exclusion did not occur until the twentieth century during the Holocaust.
This, however, raises the fundamental question of the deeper reasons behind these recurring expulsions. One might wonder why certain sources, such as the book Mein Kampf or Hitler's speeches, are so difficult to access or rarely translated for the general public. It also raises debate about the way we study history and whether the current approach allows for different perspectives, or whether we are dealing with a one-sided historiography that avoids critical questions about the past.
A Prophetic Term? The 'Six Million' Holocaust Rhetoric After 1918
The article, titled "The Crucifixion of Jews Must Stop!", was written by Martin H. Glynn, the former governor of New York. It was originally published in the American magazine The American Hebrew on October 31, 1919.
Since the opening of the archives in the former Soviet Union in the 1990s, much new information has been added.
From Rhetoric to Recording: Why the Numbers Changed Over Time
Here are the most striking examples of how those figures have changed:
Auschwitz-Birkenau (The Biggest Correction)
This is the most famous example. Before 1990, the Soviet authorities used an official death toll of 4 million for Auschwitz. This figure was even included on the memorial plaques in the camp.
Old books often mentioned the 4 million figure (based on Soviet estimates immediately after liberation).
After the 1990s: Historians like Franciszek Piper gained access to the actual transport lists and records. The figure was revised to approximately 1.1 million.
At a conference in Tehran in 2006, Moshe Aryeh Friedman attracted international attention by publicly disputing the official death toll of six million Holocaust victims. Despite fierce criticism, he continued to question the historically established statistics of the genocide.
Incidentally, 15 million Christians were murdered during the Bolshevik Revolution, but apparently, that's not considered interesting. Most victims fell during the civil war and the worst persecutions under the communists Lenin and Stalin from 1917 to 1953. Christians are expected to keep quiet, while every other faith is put on a pedestal. Similarly, Christians didn't invent slavery (which is supported by the Bible and the history of Egypt and Mesopotamia, among other places), but they are the only ones held responsible for it. This is despite the fact that Christians actually ended slavery, while slavery still exists in certain Muslim countries like Afghanistan, Mauritania, and Libya.
From the Epstein files. Jeffrey Epstein's emails, released in 2025 and 2026, reveal that he repeatedly used the term "goyim" in a derogatory context. He often used the word to distinguish between what he perceived as Jewish intellectual or financial superiority and the rest of the world, which he considered inferior or naive.
In the email in the image, he states that it's "the Jew's way of making money," while he lets the gentiles "deal in the real world." This indicates a derogatory attitude in which he dismisses non-Jews as performing physical labor, while placing himself and his circle above those rules.
Mel Gibson, who was dismissed as a village idiot by Hollywood, was not mentioned once in those documents.
From that piece: "According to sources within the security services, media magnate Robert Maxwell was a Russian spy from the 1970s onward. At that time, he assisted in the transfer of Soviet Jews to Israel, in collaboration with the Israeli intelligence service Mossad."
Is it good news that Islam is invading Europe? It's excellent news! It's Israel's broom. [...] The coming of the Messiah will only occur when Edom, Christianity, Europe, is completely destroyed. - Rabbi David Touitou (in 2013)
In a world full of disinformation and selective reporting, the truth is often the first casualty. To ensure the integrity of this platform, I have subjected every quote and statement to factual accuracy review. Preventing misinformation is my absolute priority.
Wealthy Cohen family tries to create multicultural 'Noah's Ark' by settling 70 refugee families in a small French town, but residents fight back
2022 (source) In the French village of Callac, the wealthy Cohen family is attempting to settle 70 refugee families through a utopian social experiment. Although the family themselves live in posh Parisian neighborhoods, they are willing to invest millions of euros from their own assets and taxpayers' money to realize their vision.Local residents are fiercely opposed to the Horizon Project. They point to the high unemployment rate of over 17 percent among the local population and question why newcomers are being prioritized.
Residents fear the loss of their local identity and the import of urban problems into the countryside. Critics emphasize that the Cohen family should not have to bear the consequences of the experiment themselves, while the community is largely financially self-sufficient after ten years.
A citizens' group is now demanding a referendum to keep the village's future in its own hands.
Tamara Finkelstein believes British nature reserves should be more diverse: plan to combat 'too white' countryside
2 feb 2026 UK (source Dailymail)
The plans follow a review commissioned by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), which warned that the countryside was seen as "definitely a white environment" and was at risk of becoming "irrelevant" in a multicultural society.
In the wake of the report, officials representing the National Landscapes—including the Cotswolds and Chilterns—have now published a series of management plans detailing their proposals to attract more minority communities. The Chiltern National Landscape will launch an outreach program in Luton and High Wycombe targeting Muslims. One factor that allegedly discourages ethnic minorities from visiting the countryside is "fear of off-leash dogs." The Cotswolds National Landscape specifically cited the Defra-commissioned report and said it is now committed to changing the facilities in an effort to reach "the broadest demographic."
Ardent promoter of multiculturalism for Australia says multiculturalism is bad for Israel
Isi Leibler on Australia: "It's necessary to come together and find a way for Australians to recapture that spirit of multiculturalism, which I think we're all proud to be a part of." Isi Leibler on Israel: "Multiculturalism has no place in Israel." (source)
Barbara Lerner Specter: Jews Play a "Leading Role" in Promoting Multiculturalism in Europe
"We are prisoners here," say migrants in the detention camp in the Israeli desert
Human rights activists say Israel should be ashamed of its treatment of asylum seekers at Holot, a holding facility for "infiltrators" deep in the Negev Desert.
Eritreans who were 'encouraged to leave Israel'
A group of 30 people were killed earlier this week by the Islamic State, either by being shot or beheaded, the Hotline for Refugees and Migrants claimed. Three Christian men who were apparently executed in a video by jihadists in Libya were Eritrean refugees who left Israel under its draconian asylum policies, an Israeli organization said on Tuesday.
Israeli politician admits Jews use Holocaust and anti-Semitism to silence critics
In 2002, Jewish news commentator Amy Goodman, on her program Democracy Now, interviewed former Israeli parliamentarian and education minister Shulamit Aloni, who admitted that Zionist Jews cynically invoke the Holocaust and "antisemitism" to silence their critics:
Amy Goodman: We don't often hear your critical voice in the United States. When dissatisfaction with the Israeli government's policies is expressed here in the United States, people are often called antisemitic. What is your response to that as an Israeli Jew?
Shulamit Aloni: Well, it's a trick. We always use it when someone from Europe criticizes Israel; we bring up the Holocaust. When people in this country criticize Israel, they're considered "anti-Semitic."
And the organization is strong and has a lot of money. And the ties between Israel and the American Jewish establishment are very strong, and they are strong in this country, as you know. They have power, which is fine. They are talented, powerful people, and they have money, media, and other things. And their attitude is, "Israel, my country, whether it's right or wrong." The identification.
And they're unwilling to hear criticism. It's very easy to accuse people who criticize certain actions of the Israeli government of antisemitism, and to invoke the Holocaust and the suffering of the Jewish people to justify everything we do to the Palestinians.
Deception is admitted by the author
100,000? 192,000? 40,000? Counting remains a challenge.
Did you know that..
- 150,000 Jewish soldiers served in Hitler's army, according to research by historian Bryan Mark Rigg. This figure does not refer to practicing Jews, but to individuals of partial Jewish descent, as defined by the Nuremberg Race Laws of 1935. Some high-ranking officers received a declaration of German blood signed by Hitler to remain in service. The majority, however, consisted of soldiers with one or two Jewish grandparents. They fought not for the Germans, but for a common enemy: the Soviet Union. Many soldiers of Jewish descent, particularly those from Finland or those who identified as German patriots, saw Bolshevism and Joseph Stalin as a greater immediate threat to their homeland or European civilization than Nazism at the time. For Finnish Jews, the fight against the Soviet Union was a survival struggle for their own independence, on which they happened to be on the same side as Germany.
- On April 10, 1948, Albert Einstein wrote a letter to Shepard Rifkin. Rifkin was the executive director of the "American Friends of the Fighters for the Freedom of Israel," a group that supported the Zionist militia Lehi (also known as the Stern Gang).
The exact text of the letter reads: "If a real and final catastrophe were to befall us in Palestine, the British would be primarily responsible, and the terrorist organizations that emerged from our own ranks second. I am not prepared to see anyone associated with these misguided and criminal people." Einstein wrote this out of anger over the massacre in Deir Yassin, which had recently been perpetrated by Jewish militias.
Why did the Nazis burn books by Freud and the Bolsheviks?
colloquially called 'the porn stash'
Understanding the underlying motivations of others, no matter how controversial, is essential for recognizing patterns in history. Everything has a cause, and actions often stem from a specific logic or a perceived threat. By analyzing how the Nazis interpreted certain theories and political events, you gain insight into the motivation behind their actions. This insight is not intended to justify actions, but to understand how ideologies emerge and why people resort to extreme measures like book burnings.
Sigmund Freud was of Jewish descent, and his work was labeled "Jewish pornography" by the Nazis. He argued that a boy is unconsciously attracted to his mother and sees his father as competition. Regarding the female counterpart, he argued that a daughter is attracted to her father.
These theories, along with pornographic and communist books, were burned because the Nazis saw them as an attack on German morality and the family. The motivation for Nazi aggression stemmed from the enemy image of "Judeo-Bolshevism." They pointed to the millions of Christians murdered by communist Bolsheviks and saw this as a direct consequence of Jewish ideologies (Karl Marx, for example, was Jewish). From their perspective, the fight against these books and groups was a necessary defense of civilization.
On May 6, 1933, Nazi students looted the Institute for Sexual Science in Berlin, founded in 1919 by the Jewish physician Magnus Hirschfeld. This institute was a world pioneer in the field of sexology and performed one of the first modern gender-affirming surgeries in 1930.
During the book burning on May 10, 1933, tens of thousands of books and scholarly archives on sexuality, gender identity, and early transgender care from the institute's library were destroyed.
After the book burnings came the decree against Freemasonry, which took place on January 8, 1934. By 1939, almost all members of the Rothschild family had been forced to flee Germany and Austria.
Controversial views on post-war Europe and Hitler's legacy
General George S. Patton was a high-ranking American commander during World War II, known for his leadership of the Third Army in Europe. After the German surrender in 1945, he became increasingly critical of the Allies' political choices.
He wrote in his private diaries and letters that the destruction of Germany was a strategic mistake, as he believed the country was the only barrier against Soviet communism. He fiercely criticized the Soviets, whom he described as barbarians, and advocated deploying the army directly against them before they became too powerful. He criticized denazification and publicly compared Nazi membership to membership in American political parties, which led to his resignation as military governor of Bavaria.
Patton died unexpectedly in 1945 after a car accident.
John F. Kennedy wrote the following in his diary in the summer of 1945: "After visiting these places, you can easily understand how Hitler will emerge in a few years from the hatred that now surrounds him as one of the most significant figures who ever lived. He had a boundless ambition for his country, which made him a danger to world peace, but he had a mystery about him in the way he lived and in the manner of his death, which will live and grow after him. He had the stuff of which legends are made."
John Money forced a boy into a failed sex experiment with tragic consequences. Alfred Kinsey used data from child abusers for his statistics on sexuality. Michel Foucault signed petitions to legalize sex between adults and minors. Volkmar Sigusch advocated for radical sexual liberation and the blurring of moral boundaries.
A 1930 German satirical illustration depicting what France would look like in 100 years
This image is a piece of racist propaganda, published in Germany around 1930.
Titled "Die Vernegerung Frankreichs in 100 Jahren" ("The Negation of France in 100 Years"), it was intended to stoke racial fear and cultural unrest in the wake of France's use of colonial troops during and after World War I.
The scene depicts two fashionably dressed white Europeans sitting in a circular enclosure, watched and studied by a crowd of well-dressed Black spectators, thus reversing the colonial gaze. A sign reads "Défense de donner à manger" ("No feeding"), a phrase common in zoos at the time, while the caption beneath it declares that "French people of color" have become the main attraction of the Paris Zoo.
The artwork reflects the widespread German resentment against France's deployment of African soldiers, particularly the Senegalese Tirailleurs, during the post-war occupation of the Rhineland. This resentment was racialized and weaponized in Nazi propaganda through the concept of "Schwarze Schmach" or "Black Shame," which portrayed African troops as a racial and moral threat to European civilization.
Rather than a genuine vision of the future, this cartoon was a projection of the racial anxieties of the time, intended to mock French colonial policy and multicultural society. It is a striking example of how racial caricatures and inversions were used in early 20th-century European media to maintain white supremacy and resist decolonization.
Such images played a role in laying the ideological foundation for the Nazi regime's racial policies, by reinforcing the belief that racial purity was threatened by cultural and colonial mixing.
© History Pictures
History education in the West focuses heavily on the crimes of Adolf Hitler (child benefits, highways, etc.), while the enormous death tolls under communist leaders like Mao Zedong (40 to 80 million) and Joseph Stalin (20 to 30 million) remain underexposed. This raises the question of why the atrocities of communism are less prominent in the collective European memory than those of National Socialism.
During the Nuremberg Trials (1945-1946), leading figures of the Nazi regime were tried for war crimes. American prison psychologist Gustave Gilbert was tasked with assessing the mental state of the 21 most prominent prisoners. He used the Wechsler-Bellevue intelligence test.
The results showed that most defendants scored well above average. The highest score went to Hjalmar Schacht (143), while Hermann Göring and Karl Dönitz both scored 138. The group average was 128, which is well above the general population average of 100.
Gilbert published these findings in 1947 in his book "Nuremberg Diary".
Chris Langan, with an IQ estimated at between 195 and 210, has repeatedly spoken out in interviews and on social media about the "Great Replacement" and accused specific groups, including "Zionist bankers," of plotting genocide against the white race.
Nazis had high IQs, should we ban intelligence?
Recognizing patterns is a core component of fluid intelligence. This allows you to solve complex problems, make logical connections, and process new information without specific prior knowledge. In the current public debate, there is a debate about the interpretation of patterns. Critics argue that statistics about the origins of perpetrators are sometimes selectively presented or omitted to avoid stigmatization, while others warn that such patterns without context can lead to incorrect conclusions.
The wonderful world of low IQ
No order and reason
In the case of 24-year-old Arnold Oforiwaa from Zoetermeer, the Dutch court ruled that the man killed his 22-year-old partner, Jihaneve, with 258 stab wounds in front of their baby. After the crime, the perpetrator took pictures of the victim and a selfie with the child. Due to a diagnosed very low IQ and psychosis, he was declared of diminished responsibility, resulting in a five-year prison sentence plus compulsory psychiatric treatment.
In France, a court ruled that 67-year-old Ousmane Diallo was not criminally responsible for the fatal stabbing of 18-year-old shop assistant Théo. The attack followed a dispute over a €93 phone bill. The judge followed the advice of psychiatrists who ruled that Diallo was completely insane due to severe mental disability and a low IQ at the time of the crime. He was subsequently ordered to stay in a psychiatric hospital.
In 2024, Anthony Esan attacked a soldier in England, stabbing him seventy times and attempting to behead him. This perpetrator also suffered from serious mental health issues.
Where is the money?
While we blindly embrace old stereotypes, those same billions from the oil sector quietly flow into Western universities. It's no coincidence that criticism on our campuses often goes in one direction: a mouthful about Gaza, but not a word about Iran.
The only democracy in the Middle East is condemned, while the financiers of our educational institutions-authoritarian regimes-remain unscathed. Jewish philanthropy is often cited as the driving force behind multiculturalism and societal transition. But while we debate that, billions from the Arab world are buying direct influence over our universities and think tanks. Who really decides what gets discussed in our classrooms and on the news? Follow the money, but look at all flows.
The Samaritans: a small people with a big story
The Samaritans are one of the most remarkable and least understood communities of antiquity. Their history runs like a thin but unbroken thread from the Old Testament period to the present day. While many ancient peoples disappeared or were completely absorbed into other cultures, the Samaritans-against all odds-persisted. And that makes them one of the most remarkable living remnants of the biblical world.
Originally, the Samaritans were the inhabitants of the northern kingdom of Israel. After the Assyrian conquest in the 8th century BCE, they remained in the land and continued to adhere to their own tradition, based on the first five books of Moses. Their holy place was not Jerusalem, but Mount Gerizim, which they saw as God's chosen place. This religious difference formed the core of a centuries-long hostility between Samaritans and Jews. The Jews often regarded them as a "mixed" people who had abandoned true worship, while the Samaritans, on the other hand, believed they had remained faithful to the original teachings of Moses. Thus, a deep rift grew, fueled by mutual distrust, religious rivalry, and historical wounds.
It is precisely in this context that Jesus' actions are so striking. Where his contemporaries viewed Samaritans as enemies, he consciously crossed this boundary. He spoke openly with a Samaritan woman at the well—an encounter unthinkable by the social norms of the time. In the parable of the Good Samaritan, he went even further: he made a Samaritan a model of true charity, while the religious leaders of his own people were lacking. In doing so, he radically reversed the prevailing judgment. Jesus showed that dignity and compassion are not bound by origin, tradition, or past conflicts.
What makes this story even more remarkable is that the Samaritans still exist. Not as a symbolic memory, but as a living community of approximately 900 people. They live in two places: in Holon near Tel Aviv and in Kiryat Luza on Mount Gerizim, near Nablus. They adhere to their own Torah, their own priestly lineage, and their age-old rituals. Genetic and historical studies confirm that they are truly descended from the same community mentioned in the Bible. It is as if a small piece of the world of Moses, Ezra, and Jesus is still tangibly present.
Despite their location in a politically volatile region, the Samaritans rarely engage with modern ideologies. They are neither Zionists nor Palestinian nationalists. Their community literally lives on both sides of the conflict, and their survival depends on neutrality and good relations with everyone around them. Their identity is religious and historical, not political.
That this small group—persecuted, marginalized, and nearly extinct for centuries—still exists is remarkable in itself. But the fact that they also form a direct link to the world of the Bible makes them unique. The Samaritans are a silent reminder of how ancient, complex, and layered the history of the Holy Land is. And perhaps also of how tenacious identity can be, even when everything around you is changing.
Jesus shows that old enmities are not sacred. That you don't have to keep thinking the way "people" have always thought. He broke through a barrier that was almost self-evident in his time: Jews and Samaritans didn't interact, period. And that's precisely where he stepped right through.
See the person first, not the label. Jesus didn't look at origins, group, reputation, or history. He looked at someone's heart. Prejudices are often heritage, not truth. The enmity between Jews and Samaritans was centuries old. But Jesus showed that something old isn't necessarily good. Goodness can come from those you least expect. In the parable of the Good Samaritan, He makes the "enemy" the example of love and humanity. Dignity isn't tied to identity. Jesus gave dignity to people who had been discarded by society.
The beauty is that He didn't present this as theory, but as practice. He engaged in conversation, He listened, He saw someone others didn't want to see.
For Jesus, faith isn't a "club boundary," but an invitation. Not: "You don't belong," but: "This is the path I offer you."
And that makes it less harsh than it seems at first glance. Because in his encounters, you never see exclusion. You see openness, dialogue, respect, and above all: space. And that's what we also saw in Charlie Kirk's debates.
For example, with the Samaritan woman, He doesn't say, "You don't belong here." He says, "I see you. And I offer you something."
So it's not about hostility versus faith. It's about love without limits, and a message that He Himself fully supports.